Patna High CourtMJC/5525/2013dismissed

Krishna Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.

2016-07-20Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.5525 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22013 of 2012 =========================================================== Krishna Devi, Wife Of Late Hulas Rai, Resident Of Village-Simari, Post -Simari, P.S.-Bidyapati Nagar, District-Samastipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through A.K. Sinha, son of not known to the petitioner, the Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

2. Mr. Chanchal Kumar, Son Of Not Known to the Petitioner, the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

3. Mr. Sushil Kumar, Son Of Not Known to the Petitioner the Deputy Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

4. Mr. Rajendra Prasad Choudhary, Son Of Not Known to the Petitioner, the Engineer, in Chief, Building Construction Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

5. Mr. Satya Narayan Mahto, Son Of Not Known to the Petitioner, the Superintending Engineer, South Bihar Circle, Building Construction Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna

6. Mr. Parmeshwar Prasad, Son Of Not Known to the Petitioner, the Executive Engineer, Building Division, Ara, Bhojpur, Bihar

7. Mr. Hari Gopal Prasad, Son Of Late Kameshwar Prasad Singh, the then Executive Engineer, Building Division, Ara, Bhojpur, Bihar .... .... Opposite Parties =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : M/s. Nand Lal Kumar Singh, Madhuri Lata, Advocates For the State : Mr. Binay Kumar Pandey, A.C. to G.A. 3 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 20-07-2016 A show cause affidavit has been filed on behalf of the opposite party nos.6 and 7 bringing on record Annexure A dated 10.10.2013 which is an order passed by the Secretary concerned rejecting the claim of the petitioner.

In above view of the matter, in my considered opinion,

Patna High Court MJC No.5525 of 2013 dt.20-07-2016 2 / 2 this proceeding cannot continue and is, accordingly, dropped. However, the petitioner, if he is so advised, would be at liberty to assail Annexure A before a competent forum.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Sanjay-II/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 22.07.2016 Transmission Date NA