← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/5922/2017disposed

Pushpanjali Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-08-22Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5922 of 2017 ====================================================== Pushpanjali Kumari Wife of Sri Shailendra Kumar Singh, resident of VillageChhatani, Police Station- Karagahar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

The Director, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Collector, Rohtas at Sasaram.

4.

The Presiding Officer, Zila Appiliya Pradhikar, Rohtas at Sasaram. 5.

The Sub Divisional Officer, Sasaram.

6.

The Block Development Officer, Karagahar, District- Rohtas. 7.

The Block Education Officer, Karagahar, District- Rohtas. 8.

The Block Development Extension Officer, Karagahar, District- Rohtas. 9.

Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat, Bhokhari, Police Station- Karagahar, DistrictRohtas. 10.

The Secretary, Gram Panchayat, Bhokhari, Police Station- Karagahar, District- Rohtas.

11.

Asha Kumari, Wife of Rajeshwar Kumar Singh, resident of VillageChhatani, P.O.- Basahi, Police Station- Karagahar, District- Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Choubey For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Madanjeet Singh-Gp20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 22-08-2019 In view of the fact that there is provision of appeal against the decision of District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, the writ petition is disposed of with a liberty to the petitioner to approach the State Appellate Authority and in the event the petitioner files appeal before the State Appellate Authority within a period of one month from today alongwith a copy of this order, the State Appellate Authority is required to

Patna High Court CWJC No.5922 of 2017(5) dt.22-08-2019 2/2 decide the appeal in accordance with law on its own merit after condoning the delay, if any, in filing the appeal in view of the fact that the petitioner was pursuing the remedy before this Court.

With the aforesaid, the writ application is disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U