Jugeshwar Pandit @ Ugeshwar Pandit And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.22570 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-197 Year-2017 Thana- GARAUL District- Vaishali ======================================================

1. Jugeshwar Pandit @ Ugeshwar Pandit, S/o Late Santan Pandit @ Satan Pandit,

2. Bachiya Devi W/o Jugeshwar Pandit @ Ugeshwwar Pandit , Both R/o Vill.- Majiya, P.S.- Goraul (Katahara O.P.), Distt.- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sri Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 22-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Goraul (Kathara O.P.)P.S. Case No. 197 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section 304(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioners are father -in -law and mother- in -law of the deceased. They have no concern with the affairs of deceased and her husband. One compromise petition has also been filed in the court below. From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against these petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22570 of 2018(4) dt.22-05-2018 2/2 of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with, Goraul (Kathara O.P.) P.S. Case No. 197 of 2017 they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned SDJM, Vaishali, at Hajipur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions:

(1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T