Manjit Sharma @ Ranju @ Manjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67501 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-350 Year-2024 Thana- HULASGANJ District- Jehanabad ====================================================== Manjit Sharma @ Ranju @ Manjit Kumar, S/o- Late Shiv Bachan Singh, Resident of Village - Mokimpur, P.S. - Hulasganj,District - Jehanabad ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard Mr. Bijay Prakash Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No.350 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 109(1), 351(3) and 3(5) of B.N.S.

3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has assaulted with iron rod on the head of Pramod Sharma.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. There is case and counter case between the parties and from perusal of Annexure-P/3 which injury report of Pramod

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67501 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 Sharma, it is clear that he has received one injury which is lacerated injury on the scalp in left temporal region measuring 3"x1/2". Though the nature of injury is still reserved, learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that only one blow has been made by the petitioner and the specification of the injury shows that the injury is superficial one. Petitioner is in judicial custody since 15.07.2025.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the application for bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jehanabad in connection with Hulasganj P.S. Case No. 350 of 2024.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T