Sandip Bhagat @ Jag Mohan Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63479 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2019 Thana- JAMHOR DistrictAurangabad ====================================================== 1.
SANDIP BHAGAT @ JAG MOHAN BHAGAT Son of Lalan Bhagat Resident of Village - Chitragopi, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad 2.
Prem Bhagat Son of Sri Narayan Bhagat Resident of Village - Chitragopi, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad 3.
Lalan Bhagat Son of Late Raghunath Bhagat Resident of Village - Chitragopi, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad 4.
Ankit Bhagat Son of Baban Bhagat Resident of Village - Chitragopi, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad 5.
Deepak Bhagat Son of Baban Bhagat Resident of Village - Chitragopi, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad 6.
Chandan Bhagat Son of Baijnath Bhagat Resident of Village - Chitragopi, P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/ ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Anirudh Kumar Verma, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party:
Mr. Nand Kishore Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 22-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 147, 341, 323, 504, 354, 379, 307 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 69 of 2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the backdrop of civil dispute for which Title Suit No. 171 of 2001 between the father-in-law of the informant and the petitioner's side is pending. The accusations of assault are
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63479 of 2019(2) dt.22-10-2019 2/2 general and omnibus in nature without any specific assault attributed individually by them. In any event the injuries are simple in nature. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Be that as it may, in the event of the petitioners' arrest or surrender before the court below within six weeks from the date of communication of this order, let the above named petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Jamhore P.S. Case No. 69 of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C., and also subject to the following further conditions - (i) That one of the bailors of each of the petitioners shall be their close relatives other than the petitioners herein. (ii) That the petitioners shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.
(iii) That the petitioners shall cooperate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make themselves available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (iv) That the petitioners shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.
(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T