← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20760/2017bail granted

Chandan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2017-05-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.20760 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -122 Year- 2016 Thana -SAHEBPUR KAMAL District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Chandan Yadav Son of Late Ramji Yadav, Resident of Village- Hiratol, Police Station- Shebpur Kamal, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shekhar Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashlam Ansari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-05-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act. This is the second attempt made by the petitioner. Earlier bail application of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 20.02.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. no. 7164 of 2017 with an observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that charge has already been framed in this case which will appear from para-7 of the petition and also from the impugned order. Petitioner has remained in custody for nine months. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.20760 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that petitioner has remained in custody for nine months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.,-V, Begusarai, in connection with Sahebpur Kamal P.S. Case no. 122 of 2016 , G. R. no. 2544 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

q (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T