Tirupati Commodities Pvt. Ltd., v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.2281 of 2022 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20611 of 2021 ====================================================== Tirupati Commodities Pvt. Ltd., a Registered Company having its factory Unit at Industrial Area, Maranga, Purnea through authorised representative Kumar Rajesh Male aged about 52 Years Son of Late Suresh Prasad Resident of Chhapra Colony, New Jakkanpur, P.O. and GPO-Patna-01 Presently residing at Shreepalpur, New Girls School, Punpun, P.S.-Punpun, Patna804453. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through Sandip Poundrik the Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner Department of Industries, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna. 2.
Pankaj Dixit, through the Director, Department of Industries, Patna Bihar. 3.
Sushil Kumar, through the General Manager, District Industries Centre, Purnea.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gautam Kumar Kejriwal, Advocate :
Mr. Atal Bihar Pandey, Advocate :
Mr. Alok Kumar Jha, Advocate :
Mr. Akash Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ravish Chandra, AC to SC-6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAMESH CHAND MALVIYA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI) 02-01-2024 The present MJC- contempt petition is filed for non compliance of the order dated 28.12.2021 passed in CWJC No. 20611 of 2021.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner on instruction submitted that certain grievance of the petitioner is stated to have been complied with certain conditions and further
Patna High Court MJC No.2281 of 2022(2) dt.02-01-2024 2/2 petitioner is also entitled to some more grievances to be redressed and the same has not been redressed. Having regard to the orders of this Court dated 28.12.2021 passed in CWJC No. 20611 of 2021 to the extent of consideration of the petitioner's representation and it has been considered. If the petitioner is not satisfied with the compliance order he is permitted to agitate whichever portion of the grievance has not been redressed as on today before appropriate forum.
3. With the above observations, the present proceeding of MJC- contempt petition stands dropped. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) (Ramesh Chand Malviya, J) Vikash/- U