← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1227/2017disposed

Sheo Narain Prasad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-03-08Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1227 of 2017 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15348 of 2005 ====================================================== Sheo Narain Prasad Son of Late Rup Chand Prasad Resident of Village- Dih Majhauli, P.O. Khusrupur, P.S. Bakhtiyarpur, District- Patna presently residing 7.H.F.H.I.G.- 7/14 Bahadurpur, Housing Colony P.O.- Agam Kuan, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar and Ors Bihar.

2.

Sri Amrendra Kumar Singh, Managing Director-Cum- Secretary Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.

3.

Sudhanshu Kumar Choubey Prabandhak Bhusampda Cum Additional Secretary Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.

4.

Sri Ajay Pratap Singh, Chief Engineer Bihar State Housing Board, Patna. 5.

Sri Sanjay Kumar, Executive Engineer Bihar State Housing Board, Patna, Division No. 2, Patna.

6.

Sri Sudhanshu Kumar Singh, Revenew Officer Bihar State Housing Board, Patna.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate :

Mr. Amlesh Kumar Verma, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 08-03-2019 Learned counsel for the petitioner admits that in terms of the order of the Writ Court, the opposites parties have passed the order. He prays that petitioner may be granted liberty to challenge the validity of the order contained in Memo No. 1654 dated 10.5.2005 in appropriate proceeding in accordance with law. Under the aforesaid circumstances the present proceeding is dropped.

Patna High Court MJC No.1227 of 2017(7) dt.08-03-2019 2/2 However, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the validity of order dated 10.5.2005 passed by the opposite parties in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid liberty the present Contempt application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U