Anjali Devi @ Anjani Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63467 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2019 Thana- KAHALGAON DistrictBhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
ANJALI DEVI @ ANJANI SHARMA Wife of Dinesh Sharma Resident of Village-Shyampur, P.S.-Kahalgaon, District-Bhagalpur. 2.
Dinesh Sharma Son of Late Narshing Sharma Resident of VillageShyampur, P.S.-Kahalgaon, District-Bhagalpur. 3.
Sintu Kumar Sharma @ Sintu Kumar Son of Dinesh Sharma Resident of Village-Shyampur, P.S.-Kahalgaon, District-Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioners
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners :
Mr. Rajive Ranjan Singh, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party:
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code registered in connection with Kahalgaon P.S. Case No. 170 of 2019.
3. It is submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in the backdrop of petty dispute as the parties are neighbours. The petitioner no. 2 and the informant are full brothers and there is case and counter case between the parties in which both sides have sustained injuries. The accusation of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63467 of 2019(2) dt.21-10-2019 2/2 assault are general and omnibus in nature without any specific assault attributed individually by them. There is delay in institution of the F.I.R. on 16.03.2019 for the alleged occurrence of 01.03.2019. The petitioners claim clean antecedents.
4. Learned APP on the other hand invites reference to the injury report of the Sudha Devi of the informant's side have sustained grievous injury on her head.
5. Having regard to the nature of accusations and the gravity of the offences alleged, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. The petition stands dismissed.
(Vikash Jain, J) Ibrar//- U T