Patna High CourtCWJC/9198/2012disposed

Rajiv Lochan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-10Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9198 of 2012 ======================================================

1. RAJIV LOCHAN SON OF SRI SATYADEO NARAYAN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MATIHANI, P.O.-MATIHANI, P.S.- MATIHARI, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI

2. AHMAD SHAMSAD SON OF SAIYAD MOKHTAR AHMAD RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-AZAD VILLA, POKHARIYA, P.O.- MAIN POST OFFICE, P.S. NAGAR, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI

3. MD. SHAHID EQBAL SON OF MD. OBADUR RAHMAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PHATAMACHAK, P.O.-PADRAHI, P.S.-SHIVHAR, DISTRICT-SHIVHAR

4. BAIDNATH SINGH SON OF SRI DHARMRAJ SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-MOHANPUR, P.O.-MOHANPUR, P.S.-MUFFASIL AND DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI

5. SMT. KUMARI LAXMI WIFE OF SHIL KUMAR 'DIPAK' RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-LOHIANAGAR (POLICE LINE) P.O.-SUHAD NAGAR, P.S.-MUFFASIL, DISTRICTBEGUSARAI

6. RAJIV KUMAR SON OF LATE BASUDEO PASWAN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-PASPURA, P.O.-PASPURA, P.S.- NAGAR AND DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI

7. SMT. ARCHANA KUMAR WIFE OF SANJAY KUMAR RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-KAPSIA (BACK OF S.B.I. KAPSIA BRANCH AND INFRONT OF U.P.S. COMPANY), P.S.- SINDHAL, P.O.-BAROUNI REFINERY TOWNSHIP, DISTRICTBEGUSARAI

8. KUMARI NIRUPMA WIFE OF TARUN KUMAR, D/O SMT. PRABHA SINHA RESIDENT OF MOHALLA-NEW PROFESSOR COLONY, DINKAR NAGAR, P.O.-BAROUNI REFINERY TOWNSHIP, DISTRICT-BEGUSARAI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HUMAN RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

3. THE DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Advocate.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kr Choubey Sc8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

Patna High Court CWJC No.9198 of 2012(6) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 Issue raised in the present writ application is pending consideration before the Apex Court.

In view of the above the writ application is disposed of with observation that the present writ application will finally abide by the decision of the Apex Court where the issue of equal pay for equal work is pending and the judgment is reserved. With the aforesaid the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U