Singhasan Singh @ Ram Singhasan Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65433 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2024 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== Singhasan Singh @ Ram Singhasan Singh, male, aged about 75 years, S/o Late Nanda Singh, resident of Village- Mahmadpur, P.S.- Didarganj, Patna (Bihar) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025 Heard Mr. Arun Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 102 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354(B), 448, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, due to some quarrel between the children of the respective parties, the petitioner along with other co-accused persons assaulted the informant and his family members.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65433 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Due to some quarrel between the children of the respective parties, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in the self-defence, petitioner may have caused some injury on the persons of the informant and his family members without intention. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has clean antecedent. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that due to some quarrel between the children of the respective parties, an altercation took place and both the sides entered into fierce fight and in self defence, petitioner may have caused some injury to the person of the informant or his family members without intention. There is case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner has clean antecedent. I am of the opinion that petitioner has, prima facie, made out a case to be released on pre-arrest bail.
7. The petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his/her arrest or
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65433 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 surrender before the learned District Court within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Civil Court, Patna City, in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 102 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS.
8. The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically. (Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U T