Yamuna Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6463 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Yamuna Singh, Son of Late Deoki Rai, Resident of VillageSoarmarawa East, Post- Patila, Police Station & Block- Maner, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Panchati Raj Department, Bihar, Patna.

2. The District Magistrate, Patna.

3. The District Panchayat Officer, Patna.

4. The District Accounts Officer, Patna.

5. The Block Development Officer, Dhanarua, District- Patna.

6. The Block Development Officer, Danapur, District- Patna. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jitendra Kumar Roy For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.N. Shahi- Aag6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 12-02-2018 The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the grievance of the petitioner pertaining to non-grant of the benefits of the 1st and 2nd A.C.P. be considered by the respondents and a speaking order be directed to be passed within a specified time frame. It is further submitted that the Block Development Officer, Dhanarua has already recommended the case of the petitioner for grant of 1st and 2nd A.C.P.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner should file a detailed representation within a period of two weeks from today before the respondent no. 2 and the respondent no. 2 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of four weeks thereafter

Patna High Court CWJC No.6463 of 2017 (2) dt.12-02-2018 2/2 by a reasoned and speaking order.

The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U