Patna High CourtCR. MISC./70090/2024dismissed

Rajkumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-21Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70090 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-209 Year-2024 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Rajkumar Ram Son of Bechan Ram R/o Village -Rajwara, Police StationBabubarhi District -Madhubani 2.

Mukesh Ram son of Rajkumar Ram R/o Village -Rajwara, Police StationBabubarhi District -Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 209 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 379, 354(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners along with other co-accused persons are said to have assaulted the informant and his family members.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70090 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 specific rather general and omnibus in nature. He submits that there is allegation against the petitioners of assaulting the wife and daughter of the informant by means of farsa but the injury was found caused by hard and blunt object not by sharp cut weapon. The petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposing the bail petition submitted that the petitioners are said to have assaulted and injured persons and the injury was found grievous in nature, it is clear from the impugned order itself.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of case and the nature of the injury, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) anand/- U T