Chandresh Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3407 of 2018 ====================================================== Chandresh Kumar Son of Ram Lom Bhagat resident of Village - Ram Nagar, P.O. - Sedahan, P.S. - Tarari, District - Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union Of India 2.

The Khuda Baksh Oriental Public Library through its Director, Ashok Rajpath, Patna.

3.

The Director, Khuda Baksh Oriental Public Library cum Commissioner, Patna Division, Ashok Rajpath, ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Humayou Ahmad Khan, Advocate Mr. Mushtaque Alam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Praveen Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 19-09-2023 Heard the parties.

2. The writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs:

(i) the respondents may be directed to allow the petitioner to continue on his respective post;

(ii) the respondents may be granted to temporary status to the petitioners and not to terminate the services of the petitioner;

(iii) the respondents may be directed to consider representation of the petitioner.

(iv) may kindly direct the Chairman, Khuda Bhaksh Central Public Library to comply the order of the Hon'ble High Court, as well as the order of Joint Secretary on point of absorption of

Patna High Court CWJC No.3407 of 2018(3) dt.19-09-2023 2/2 the daily wages worker, who have been orally terminated by the authority concerned on their respectable posts as considering per qualification the direction of service;

(v) for issuance of writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 10.10.2017, passed by the Executive Committee, Government of India, Culture Department, Shastri Bhawan, New Delhi decided the to in which it absorb fresh respective (Library class-IV attendance). part of order. It has comes been in staff one part of order.

It has been wrongly stated part of order that the in 2nd committee is following the order of the Hon'ble Court, which is quite wrong and absurd.

3. It would be appropriate that the petitioner seeks alternate remedy.

4. The writ petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajiv Roy, J) Jagdish/- U