← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./65161/2025allowed

Dablu Kumar @ Dablu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-23Mr. Justice Ashok Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65161 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2025 Thana- ISMAILPUR District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Dablu Kumar @ Dablu Yadav Son of Varun Yadav R/o Village - Chakmafiya, P.S.- Rajon, District - Banka.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. B.N. Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 23-09-2025 Heard Mr. Diwakar Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B.N. Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Ishmilepur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from a bolero car, 626.24 liters of country-made foreign liquor was recovered. Petitioner is said to be the driver of the vehicle.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner and he was unaware of the illicit

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65161 of 2025(2) dt.23-09-2025 2/2 liquor in the vehicle. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 18.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Judge-I, Bhagalpur in connection with Ishmilepur P.S. Case No. 133 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T