Dharmendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72460 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-24 Year-2024 Thana- MOHANPUR District- Gaya ====================================================== 1.
Dharmendra Yadav Son of Raghav yadav R/O Vill.- Karma, P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar 2.
Jitendra Kumar Yadav Son of Raghav Yadav R/O Vill.- Karma, P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar 3.
Shikandra Kumar Son of Raghav Yadav R/O Vill.- Karma, P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar 4.
Dhiraj Kumar Son of Dharmendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Karma, P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar 5.
Rabita Devi Wife of Dharmendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Karma, P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar 6.
Kamleshi Devi Wife of Jitendra Yadav R/O Vill.- Karma, P.S.- Dobhi, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 29-10-2024 Heard Mr. Shailesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Allegedly, these petitioners are said to have assaulted the informant and her husband brutally by means of deadly
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72460 of 2024(2) dt.29-10-2024 2/3 weapons due to which they sustained injuries.
4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. They have been falsely implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is totally false and based on concocted facts. There is an admitted land dispute between the parties. Both sides have filed cases against each other. During the alleged occurrence, both sides have sustained injuries and the injuries sustained by the informant's side were found simple in nature. Learned counsel further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.
5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the nature of the injuries sustained by the informant's side i.e. simple, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72460 of 2024(2) dt.29-10-2024 3/3 pending/successor Court in connection with Mohanpur P.S. Case No. 24 of 2024, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.
(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T