Kiran Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16732 of 2022 ====================================================== Kiran Kumari Wife of Siyaram Ray, daughter of Singheshwar Yadav, Resident of village - Purnahi, Ward No. - 4, P.S.- Warisnagar, DistrictSamastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Chairman, Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar. having office at Sardar Patel Bhawan, 6th Floor, Block A/626, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna.

4.

The Officer on Special Duty (OSD), Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment). having office at Sardar Patel Bhawan, 6th Floor, Block A/626, Jawaharlal Nehru Marg, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Shankar Singh, Advocate For the State :

Mr.Md. Nadim Seraj ( Gp 5 ) For CSBC :

Mr. Sanjay Pandey, Advocate Mr. Binod Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Vivek Anand Amritesh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-04-2024 Though the present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondent-authorities to appoint the petitioner on the post of constable pursuant to the selection process initiated vide Advertisement No.5 of 2020, however, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Central Selection Board (Constable Recruitment), Bihar, Patna submits by referring to paragraph no.4 of the supplementary counter affidavit filed in the present that the petitioner has secured less marks than the cut off marks in her category, i.e. BC-F-NHG inasmuch as cut

Patna High Court CWJC No.16732 of 2022(3) dt.23-04-2024 2/2 off marks in this category is 68 while the petitioner has secured only 58 marks, hence she has not stood qualified in the selection process.

2.

The aforesaid aspect of the matter has not been controverted by the learned counsel for the petitioner and he submits that the present writ petition be disposed of. 3.

Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U