Ranjit Yadav And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17312 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -40 Year- 2017 Thana -BHEJA District- MADHUBANI ======================================================

1. Ranjit Yadav, Son of Babu Narayan Yadav,

2. Md. Lalu @ Lal Mohammad Son of Md. Izaharul,

3. Satto Yadav, Son of Late Ram Bahadur Yadav, All three Resident of Village Partaha, O.P.- Darhar, P.S.- Nawhatta, District- Saharsa.

4. Baidya Nath Yadav @ Baij Nath Yadav, Son of Bhpendra Yadav,

5. Jawahar Yadav, Son of Late Anandi Yadav.

6. Pradeep Yadav, Son of Jawahar Yadav.

7. Sudish Yadav @ Sudish Kumar, Son of Jawahar Yadav,

8. Ranjan Yadav @ Ranjan Kumar Yadav, Son of Jyotish Yadav.

9. Arun Paswan, Son of Ram Sagar Paswan, no. 4 to no. 9 resident of Village- Sundarpur, P.S.- Bheja, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-06-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 40 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. Allegation against the petitioners is of firing causing injury to brother of informant.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that in this case thirteen persons have been named in the F.I.R and no specific allegation has been attributed and though there is allegation of firing but the said firing did not hit anybody. It has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17312 of 2018 (3) dt.19-06-2018 2/3 also been submitted that the injury received by the brother of informant is found to be simple in nature.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant. Learned counsel for the informant has submitted that the petitioners have criminal antecedents.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate - III, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani, in connection with Bheja P.S. Case No. 40 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17312 of 2018 (3) dt.19-06-2018 3/3 as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T