← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69918/2024bail granted

Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-05-08Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69918 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1013 Year-2023 Thana- MUNGER COMPLAINT CASE District- Munger ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Late Shiv Kumar Singh Village -Dilip Nagar colony, road no 2, PS -Naya Ramnagar, Distt- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Supriya Bharti Wife of Rahul Kumar village- Aamari, Ps- Dharahra, DistMunger Banka ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Adv.

For the State :

Mr. Bishweshwar Ram, APP.

For the Complainant :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar, Adv.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2025 The petitioner and the complainant are present along with their counsels in the Chambers proceedings.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498(A), 323, 406, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code, but the cognizance has been taken under Sections 498A, 323, 406, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the D.P. Act against the petitioner.

3. Petitioner, who is husband of complainant, is said to have tortured upon her physically and mentally and ousted her from the matrimonial house in association of his family members over the dowry demand.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69918 of 2024(7) dt.08-05-2025 2/3

4. After a brief interaction with the parties, it appears that the matter cannot be finally resolved at this stage. The matter had earlier been sent to the Mediation Centre, Patna High Court for resolving the disputes between the parties, but the process there also had failed.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that all the allegations levelled against the petitioner are not correct, whereas learned counsel for the complainant supports the allegations levelled in the complaint petition.

6. At this stage, the petitioner, who is present in person, makes an offer that the petitioner would make the payment of Rs. 5000.00/- (Rupees Five Thousand) per month to the complainant in the second week of every month to which the complainant agrees.

7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Complaint Case No. 1013 of 2023, subject to the condition as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69918 of 2024(7) dt.08-05-2025 3/3 laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. It goes without saying that the aforesaid payment shall be subject to any order being passed in matrimonial maintenance case or any other collateral proceedings.

9. Learned counsel for the complainant is directed to furnish the bank account details of the complainant in the learned Court below. If the complainant fails to furnish the same, the aforesaid amount will be deposited in the learned Court below which will be released in favour of the complainant after she furnishes her bank account details. If the petitioner fails to pay the aforesaid amount on two consecutive months, the complainant shall be at liberty to move before the learned Court below for cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

10. Accordingly, this application stands disposed of. (Soni Shrivastava, J) divyanshi/- U T