← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/4793/2012disposed

Bijai Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-03-06Mr. Justice Hemant Gupta2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4793 of 2012 Arising out of Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 22549 of 2011. =========================================================== Bijai Prasad Singh, S/O Late Naresh Prasad Singh, R/O Village + P.O. Ghughuldih, District - Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Sri Deepak Singh, Son of Not Known, Presently the Principal Secretary Environment & Forest, Bihar, Patna

3. Sri B.N. Khan, Son of Not Known, Presently the Principal Chief Conservator of Forest, Bihar, Patna

4. Sri Rajbansh Singh, Son of Not Known, Presently the Conservator of Forest Wild - Life Circle, Patna

5. Sri S. Sudhakar, Son of Not Known Presently the Divisional Forest Officer, Munger .... .... Opposite Parties.

=========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. AMAR PRAKASH, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. RAJEEV KR. SINGH, GP 15. =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT GUPTA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 06-03-2017 This Court on 16.12.2011 disposed of Writ Application filed by the petitioner with a direction to the respondent no. 2 to consider the claim of the petitioner and, if the claim is found to be genuine, to pass an order for clearing the arrears of salary and, in case of refusal, to pass a speaking order.

2. In terms of such directions, an order has been passed on 07.11.2012 (Annexure 'C' to the Show Cause) which, inter alia, states that the financial benefits have been paid to the petitioner except salary for the months of February and March, 2010 which is against the Circular dated 01.04.1991 of the State Government.

Patna High Court MJC No.4793 of 2012 dt.06-03-2017 2/2

3. In view of the said facts, the present contempt petition is rendered infructuous and the same stands disposed of.

4. However, it shall be open to the petitioner to seek remedy against the above order in accordance with law. (Hemant Gupta, ACJ) Dilip/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date Transmission Date