Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Patel @ Dilip Mahto v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65265 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2022 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura ====================================================== Dilip Kumar @ Dilip Kumar Patel @ Dilip Mahto Son of Late Chandrashekhar Patel @ Bale Patel Resident of village - Panchi, PsShekhopur Sarai, Dist- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Chandra Mohan Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Parmanand Prasad, A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 120(B), and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner is an active member of a cybercrime gang involved in alluring the general public in the name of an agency of Himalaya Company and also providing loans from Bajaj Finance. As per the seizure list, a large number of mobile phones embedded with SIM cards have been recovered.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that name of the petitioner surfaced during the course of investigation on the basis of the disclosure made by co-accused Balo Mahto @ Bablu Mahto. No incriminating articles have been recovered from the possession of the petitioner and the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65265 of 2025(2) dt.05-12-2025 2/2 petitioner claims clean antecedents. A similarly situated coaccused, Abinash Paswan @ Abinash Kumar, has been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 09.08.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37524 of 2024.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.
7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above-named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Sheikhpura, in connection with Shekhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 136 of 2022, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Neha/- U T