Akhilesh Ray @ Akhilesh Kumar Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.25653 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -102 Year- 2016 Thana -RAGHOPUR District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================
1. Akhilesh Ray @ Akhilesh Kumar Ray, S/o Rajendra Ray, Resident of Village- Mirzapur, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vasant Vikas For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Khurshid Anwar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 25-06-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 447, 341, 323, 324, 307 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner and others is of assault to the informant causing injury to him.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that that there is case and counter case between the parties and although there is allegation of assault by the petitioner by means of lathi to the informant, however, injury was found to be simple in nature. Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, nature of offence and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and only general and omnibus allegation has been levelled against him, let the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.25653 of 2018 (3) dt.25-06-2018 2/2 court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned ACJM -IV, Vaishali, Hajipur, in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 102 of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T