Rameshwar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37989 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -217 Year- 2017 Thana -BARUN District- AURANGABAD ======================================================

1. Rameshwar Thakur S/o Krit Thakur, R/o Vill.- Kaus, P.S.- Barun, District- Aurangabad.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Murari Mishra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajendra Singh Shastriji ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 21-08-2018 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 366/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegation against the petitioner is of abduction of mother of informant.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been made accused in this case only on the basis of suspicion that before the occurrence, petitioner had a talk with the mother of the informant over phone and except that there is nothing on record to show the involvement of the petitioner in this abduction of mother of the informant.

Learned counsel for the state opposed the prayer for bail however, he could not show any other circumstance to show the involvement of the petitioner in the alleged offence. Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37989 of 2018 (3) dt.21-08-2018 2/2 the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, in connection with Barun P.S. Case No. 217 of 2017, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T