Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/2065/2018allowed

Prem Sagar Chauhan v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-23Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.2065 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -171 Year- 2017 Thana -RAGHUNATHPUR District- SIWAN ===========================================================

1. Prem Sagar Chauhan S/o Sri Nayak Chauhan, R/o Vill.- Rakauli , P.S.- Raghunathpur, District- Siwan.

.... .... Appellant/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Raghav Prasad, Adv For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, SPP =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 23-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This is an appeal under Sections 14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, against refusal of the prayer for anticipatory bail by order dated 16.04.2018 in A.B.P. No.475 of 2018 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Siwan in connection with Raghunathpur P.S.Case No. 171 of 2017 registered under Sections 341,323,504/34 of the Indian Penal Code as well as under Sections 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act.

Offences of the Indian Penal Code alleged against the appellant are bailable. Appellant has stated on oath that he has got no criminal antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.2065 of 2018 dt.23-08-2018 2/2 Considering the aforesaid fact, let the appellant, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.20,000 (Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with the aforesaid case, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and both bailors shall be resident of territorial jurisdiction of the learned court below and further the appellant shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the appellant. Accordingly, the impugned order is set aside and this appeal stands allowed.

(Birendra Kumar, J) Nitesh/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date25.08.2018 Transmission Date 25.08.2018