Prince Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67304 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-215 Year-2024 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Prince Kumar S/o Jarkeshwar Paswan @ Tarkeshwar Paswan R/o Mohalla - Jawahar Jolla, P.S - Ara Nawada, District - Bhojpur (Ara) ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard Mr. Aryan Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. Petitioner seeks bail, who is in custody since 29.04.2025, in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 215 of 2024, F.I.R. dated 26.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341/323/307/504/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Earlier, this petitioner has moved this Court for grant of regular bail in Cr. Misc. No. 54916 of 2025 and the same was dismissed as withdrawn vide order dated 11.08.2025.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has clean antecedent and he has been falsely implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67304 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/3 committed any offence. Petitioner has fired upon Shubham Kumar and Sona Sah. Although, both the persons have received injuries but injury report of Shubham Kumar and the injury report of Sona Sah suggest that the injuries are simple in nature and the police after investigation submitted chargesheet against the petitioner and the petitioner is in custody since 29.04.2025.
5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the fact that the petitioner having clean antecedent as well as the injury inflicted upon the injured persons are simple in nature, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur, in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 215 of 2024, subject to the following conditions :-
(1) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67304 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 3/3 reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.
(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witness, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
(3) And, further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage, it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Saif/- U T