Aditya Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60464 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-167 Year-2019 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== Aditya Kumar, Son of Mukesh Das, Resident of Village - Lala Toli, Hansraj Ki Deohari, P.S.- Khajekala, Town and Distt.- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Amarendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 09.04.2019 in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.167 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 457 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that initially the petitioner was taken into custody in Khajekala P.S. Case No.169 of 2019 and thereafter, he was remanded in several cases. It is further submitted that so far as the present case is concerned, there is absolutely no material against the petitioner and he has been dragged in at the pleasure of the police. It is further submitted that no T.I. Parade has been held nor has anything been recovered from his possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60464 of 2019(2) dt.04-11-2019 2/3 Considering the aforementioned facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No.167 of 2019, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, father, mother, son, brother, sister and/or his wife.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60464 of 2019(2) dt.04-11-2019 3/3 and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T