Kamla Shankar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15594 of 2023 ====================================================== 1.
Kamla Shankar Mishra Son of Ram Nagina Mishra, Resident of Mohalla - Mitra Lok Colony, Pandey Path, Buxar, Police Station - Muffasil, District - Buxar.
2.
Sri Niwash Upadhyay, Son of Late Ram Jas Upadhyay, resident of village and Post Office - Majhaunwa, Police Station - Buxar Industrial, District - Buxar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar.
2.
The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna. 3.
The Additional Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.
4.
The Special Director, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Vikash Bhawan, Patna.
5.
The Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna through its Secretary. 6.
The Chairman, Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 7.
The Secretary, the Bihar Sanskrit Shiksha Board, Bihar, Patna. 8.
The District Education Officer, Buxar, District - Buxar. 9.
The District Programme Officer, Buxar, District - Buxar. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Suresh Kumar Ishwar For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Subhash Chandra Mishra ( Sc 16 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-04-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the case of the petitioners is fully covered by the judgment passed by this Court in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 and analogous cases. 3.
Considering the aforesaid facts, since the case of the petitioners stand on similar to that of the petitioners of L.P.A. No.43
Patna High Court CWJC No.15594 of 2023(2) dt.08-04-2024 2/2 of 2016, there is no requirement to keep pending the present writ application.
4.
Accordingly, petitioners are directed to file a detailed representation along with a copy of the order passed in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016, before the respondent no.9 within a period of four weeks and the respondent no.9 is well advised to consider the case of the petitioners and dispose of the representation of the petitioners after affording an opportunity of personal hearing or through their counsel and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and in light of the order passed in L.P.A. No.43 of 2016 within ten weeks from the date of filing of such representation by the petitioners and also pay the claim/admitted dues of the petitioners. 5.
The respondent no.9 shall be personally held responsible for non-compliance of this order.
6.
With the aforesaid directions, this writ application stands disposed of.
7.
It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion with regard to the merits of the claim of the petitioners. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U