Kumar Jeet Paswan @ Umarjeet Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71309 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-40 Year-2024 Thana- KASMA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Kumar Jeet Paswan @ Umarjeet Paswan, aged about 19 years, Male, S/oBaburam Paswan, Resident of Village- Arthua, P.S. Kasma, Dist- Aurangabad ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Aman Vishal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajit Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 13-12-2024 Heard Mr. Aman Vishal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seek regular bail in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 40 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 379, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
3. As per the allegation made in the FIR, all the accused persons including the petitioner, tried to kill the informant while she was coming from the field and when the villagers came to save her, accused persons had also assaulted them.
2/4
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submitted that the present case is counterblast to Kasma P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024 lodged on 18.03.2024 and as a result of the same, on false accusation, the informant has lodged the present FIR against the petitioner and other accused persons. He further submitted that free fight took place on the alleged date of incidence and petitioner may have caused some injury in his self defence without intention. Both the parties are agnate and there is long standing land dispute. Petitioner has clean antecedent and he is in custody since 27.05.2024. On these grounds, petitioner seeks to be released on pre-arrest bail.
5. Learned APP for the State vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail.
6. Considering the rival submissions made on behalf of the parties, as well as, the fact that the present case is counterblast to Kasma P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024 lodged on 18.03.2024 and as a result of the same, on false accusation, the informant has lodged the present FIR against the petitioner and other accused persons. Free fight took place on the alleged date of incidence and petitioner may have caused some injury in his
3/4 self defence without intention and also the fact that petitioner has clean antecedent, the learned District Court is directed to release the petitioner, above named, on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad (BIHAR) in connection with Kasma P.S. Case No. 40 of 2024 subject to the following conditions:
(i) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(ii) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court. (iii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (iv) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence, after his release on bail, the trial Court shall take steps to cancel his bail bond.
(v) The learned District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail application. If any other case is pending against the
4/4 petitioner as what has been stated in paragraph no. 3, this order will lose its force automatically.
(Purnendu Singh, J) Sanjay/- U T