Ramjas Mahto @ Ramyash Mahato @ Ramjash Mahato v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72478 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2022 Thana- MOHAMMADPUR District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Ramjas Mahto @ Ramyash Mahato @ Ramjash Mahato S/o Late Dularchand Mahto R/o Village- Salehpur, P.S.- Mohammadpur, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Shukla For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ahmad Ali ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 10-01-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 03.04.2024, he is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that on account of dispute relating to land, an altercation had taken place in which both sides assaulted each other and petitioner is alleged to have assaulted the informant by tangi causing injury on head which is opined to be grievous, but then, it is submitted that the blow was not repeated. It is also submitted that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72478 of 2024(2) dt.10-01-2025 2/2 petitioner and the informant are agnates and are having dispute relating to property, as such, petitioner is not a criminal.

4. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 6th, Gopalganj in connection with Mohammadpur P. S. Case No.297 of 2022.

6. The application stands allowed.

7. However, in the event, if the learned trial Court comes to a conclusion that the petitioner after his release is trying to delay the trial in any manner, the learned trial Court shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds after recording reasons. (Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T