Raghu Yadav @ Roghu Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65522 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-33 Year-2025 Thana- Patauna District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Raghu Yadav @ Roghu Yadav S/O Late Faguni Yadav R/O Village- Teghara, P.S.- Patauna, District- Madhubani 2.

Agar Devi W/O Raghu Yadav R/O Village- Teghara, P.S.- Patauna, DistrictMadhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Gagandeo Yadav, Advocate Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate Mr. Udeshya Kumar Yadav, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 16-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners seek bail in connection with Patauna P.S. Case No. 33 of 2025, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 103(1), 80, 238 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that daughter of the informant was done to death by her in-laws for nonfulfillment of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioners also submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65522 of 2025(2) dt.16-09-2025 2/2 that the petitioners are father-in-law and mother-in-law of the deceased. No any specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners rather the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the husband of the deceased is in judicial custody since 27.04.2025 and the petitioners are separate in mess and business from the husband of the deceased. The petitioners are in custody since 27.04.2025 and have got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioners, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioners.

7. Let the petitioners be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Patauna P.S. Case No. 33 of 2025.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T