Prince Kumar @ Bittu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65033 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-151 Year-2025 Thana- Arwal District- Arwal ====================================================== Prince Kumar @ Bittu Son of Jawahar Mahto, Resident of Village - Fatehpur, P.S.- Sandesh, District - Bhojpur.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ramakant Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025, dated 23.04.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 109, 317(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 318(4) read with Section 3(5) of the BNS and Section 25(1-b)a, 26 and 27 of the Arms Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on 23.04.2025 at about 09:48 hrs, the informant received an information that three criminals were planning to loot the Punjab National Bank, CSP Centre, Bhadasi and acting on the said information the informant reached Bhadasi Bazar. On seeing Police, the three criminals started fleeing in different directions, but Police managed to apprehend one person from whose possession one pistol was

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65033 of 2025(3) dt.10-11-2025 2/2 recovered and another person (petitioner) was caught by the villagers and from his possession one mobile phone was recovered.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any such offence as alleged in the FIR. The petitioner has got four criminal antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 23.04.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as petitioner's period of custody, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bailbond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand Only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arwal, in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 151 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T