Ajay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15220 of 2024 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Singh Son of Sri Raghubansh Singh Resident of Village- Turki, P.S.- Chenari, District- Rohtas (Sasaram).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.
The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3.
The Director-cum-Upper Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4.
The Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
5.
The District Collector, Nalanda.
6.
The Additional Collector, Nalanda.
7.
The Deputy Collector, Revenue and Land Reforms, Hilsa, Nalanda. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Virendra Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Government Pleader (4) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 07-10-2024 Heard Learned Counsel for the petitioner and Learned Counsel for the State.
2. The present writ petition has been filed for the following relief/s:- "I. For quashing the order contained in Memo no. 917 dated 15/05/2024 (annexed as Annexure-P/17) by which the Disciplinary Authority has passed order without considering the show cause, 2nd Show cause submitted by the petitioner and without examined any
Patna High Court CWJC No.15220 of 2024(2) dt.07-10-2024 2/2 witnesses and Disciplinary Authority passed punishment order on 15.05.2024 without examined any witness and it is against the eye of law as well as also ignoring the judicial pronouncement of the Hon'ble Courts."
3. After some arguments, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that permission may be granted to prefer appeal against the order challenged in the present writ petition.
4. Learned Counsel for the State submits that he has no objection if, petitioner prefers appeal.
5. Upon perusal of the records, it transpires to this Court that appeal to the petitioner lies under the Bihar Government Servant (Classification, Control & Appeal) Rules, 2005.
6. In the light of the submissions made by the parties, the present writ petition stands disposed off granting liberty to the petitioner to prefer appeal before the Appellate Authority. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Divyansh/- U