Ram Narayan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61899 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-62 Year-2019 Thana- JADIA District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.
RAM NARAYAN MEHTA Son of Late Rameshwar Mehta Resident of Village - Koriyapatti, P.S.- Jadia, Dist.- Supaul. 2.
Munna Kumar Mehta @ Amit Kumar Son of Ram Narayan Mehta. Resident of Village - Koriyapatti, P.S.- Jadia, Dist.- Supaul. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Kamal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Arun Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 16-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Jadia P.S. Case No. 62 of 2019 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 353, 504, 379, 511/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the petitioner, who are of clean antecedent, are innocent and have not committed any offence. In fact, no occurrence has taken place rather the petitioners have already deposited the electricity bill amount of Rs. 5901 which is evident from Annexure-2. The allegation of assault
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61899 of 2019(2) dt.16-10-2019 2/2 and snatching money from the informant is totally false and fabricated. Hence, the petitioners may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel for the state has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioners have assaulted the government officials of the electricity department while they were disconnecting there electricity connection on non-payment of electricity dues. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail of these petitioners is rejected. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T