← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/1590/2017disposed

Sadanand Singh And ORS v. The State Of Bihar, Through Its Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2019-07-16Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No. 1590 of 2017 Arising out of Miscellaneous Appeal No. 380 of 2000 ====================================================== 1.

Sadanand Singh, Sons of Late Chandra Prasad Singh. 2.

Dayanand Singh, Sons of Late Chandra Prasad Singh. 3.

Abhay Kumar Singh, Son of Late Surya Narayan Singh. 4.

Jai Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ramanand Singh.

5.

Sri Kant Singh, Son of Late Surendra Narayan Singh @ Surendra Prasad Singh.

6.

Sri Mohan Singh, Son of Late Damodar Singh. All Residents of Ward No. 14, Mohalla-Bihari, Post Office and Police Station-Jamui, District-Jamui. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar, through its Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Registrar, Civil Court, Jamui.

3.

Bhagwan Singh.

4.

Bhawani Singh 5.

Shesh Singh @ Shashi Bhushan Singh, Son of Late Lachman and residents of Ward No. 14, Mohalla-Bihari, Post Office and Police Station-Jamui, District- Jamui.

6.

Deepak Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ganesh Singh, 7.

Anup Prakash Singh, Son of Late Ganesh Singh. 8.

Smt. Gita Devi, Wife of Late Ganesh Singh, Opposite Parties No. 6 to 8 are residents of In Front of Ashok Town Hall, Post Office and Police StationJamui, District-Jamui. 9.

Smt. Janaki Devi, Wife of Late Surendra Prasad Singh and daughter of Late Ganesh Singh.

10.

Smt. Murti Devi @ Indira, Wife of Dinesh Mohan Singh and daughter of Late Gosreelal Singh. Opposite Parties No. 9 and 10 are residents of Ward No. 14, Mohalla- Bihari, Post Office and Police Station-Jamui, DistrictJamui. .......................... Opposite Party/s 1st Set 11.

Digamber Prasad Singh, Son of Late Chandrika Singh, Retired Executive Engineer, Mohalla-Bihar, Near Forest Department, Post Office and Police Station- Jamui, District- Jamui.

12.

Dr. Bansidhar Singh, Son of Late Yogeshwar Prasad Singh, Retired Veterinary Officer, Mohalla-Kalyanpur, Near Saheb Talab, Jamui, DistrictJamui. ................. Opposite Party/s 2nd Set 13.

Adaya Prasad Singh, Son of Late Sarju Prasad Singh. 14.

Shashidhar Singh Son of Late Sarju Prasad Singh.

Patna High Court MJC No.1590 of 2017 dt.16-07-2019 2/3 15.

Jogendra Narayan Singh, Son of Late Sarju Prasad Singh. 16.

Sarangdhar Singh, Son of Late Sarju Prasad Singh. 17.

Dwijendra Narayan Singh, Son of Late Sarju Prasad Singh. 18.

Kumar Dharmendra Singh @ Kumar Dharmendra, Son of Late Sarju Prasad Singh.

19.

Kumar Sanjay Singh @ Kumar Sanjay, Son of Late Satya Narayan Singh. Opposite Parties No. 13 to 19 are residents of Ward No. 14, Mohalla-Bihari, Post Office and Police Station-Jamui, District-Jamui. ... ... Opposite Party/s /3rd Set.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.

For the State :

Mr. Pushkar Narain Shahi, Sr. Advocate Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, AC to AAG 6 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 16-07-2019 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned AAG 6 for the State has assisted the Court.

2. At the very outset, learned AAG 6 points out that by order dated 12.05.2009, passed in MA No. 380 of 2000, the Court had interfered in the order passed by the Court below in Miscellaneous Case No. 31 of 1999, reviving Title Suit No. 7 of 1994 and whatever was required to be done was by the Court concerned and not by any of the State authorities. It was further submitted that the Court had in fact interfered in the order passed in Miscellaneous Case No. 31 of 1999 and accordingly had directed that the original Title Suit No. 7 of 1994 was restored. Learned counsel submitted that the application having been filed

Patna High Court MJC No.1590 of 2017 dt.16-07-2019 3/3 in May, 2017 and up-to-date position not being on record, it is likely that the order of the Court has been complied with.

3. Having regard to the aforesaid, the Court does not find any reason to keep the matter pending.

4. Accordingly, the application stands disposed off. (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) Anand Kr.

AFR/NAFR U T