Sachchidanand @ Sachita Nand v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.59352 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2015 Thana- PATNA COMPLAINT CASE DistrictPatna ====================================================== Sachchidanand @ Sachita Nand S/o Late Yogendra Prasad, R/o Vill.- Momindpur, P.S.- Fatuha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. State Of Bihar

2. Priyanka Devi D/o Tirpit Narayan , R/o Vill.- Mai, P.S.- Dhanarua, DistrictPatna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manoj Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Ajit Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 21-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. No one appears on behalf of opposite party no. 2 in course of argument.

The petitioner in the present case is the husband and is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Complaint Case No. 261 (C) of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 498A, 323, 379, 341, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 / 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready and willing to keep opposite party no. 2 in his matrimonial home with full dignity and care. It is his apprehension that the parents of opposite party no. 2 will not

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59352 of 2018(5) dt.21-01-2019 2/3 allow her to accompany the petitioner.

Learned counsel for the State is present.

In the facts and circumstances of the case and in view of what has transpired in course of submission, the petitioner will go to the maike of opposite party no. 2 within a period of two weeks from today with prior information to the concerned S.H.O. of the Police Station within whose jurisdiction the opposite party no. 2 resides presently. On such information, the S.H.O. of the concerned Police Station will take care of the safety of the petitioner. It will be opened for opposite party no. 2 to accompany the petitioner or to refuse but a report in this regard will be submitted by the S.H.O. to the concerned court of the learned Judicial Magistrate where the matter is pending presently.

The petitioner has undertaken that if the opposite party no. 2 accompanied him to live in the matrimonial home, he will take full care of opposite party no. 2. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above named, in case of his arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri B.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59352 of 2018(5) dt.21-01-2019 3/3 N. Tripathi, J. M. Ist Class, Masaurhi, Patna in connection with Complaint Case No. 261 ( C) of 2015, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T