Md. Nasim v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67491 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-380 Year-2025 Thana- PURNEA SADAR District- Purnia ====================================================== Md. Nasim S/o Md. Seikh Abbas @ Md. Abbas @ Late Seikh Abbas R/o Village- Akhtiarpur, Ward No. 05, P.S.- Sarsi, District- Purnea ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. N.K. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate Mr. Kumar Rajdeep, Advocate Mrs. Diksha Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard Mr. N.K. Agrawal, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey, learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with N.D.P.S. Case arising out of Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 317(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 8, 17(a), 18(a), 8(c) and 21(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. The case of the prosecution is that from the possession of this petitioner, mobile phone was recovered. However, from the possession of the co-accused, certain contrabands were recovered.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67491 of 2025(2) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that one Bulbul Parveen, from whose possession 10 gm of afeem was recovered, has been granted bail by the learned co-ordinate bench of this court in Cr. Misc. No. 65308 of 2025. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 27.07.2025.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Special Judge (N.D.P.S. Act), Purnea in connection with Sadar P.S. Case No. 380 of 2025.

(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T