← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16679/2022withdrawn

Shakti Singh v. The Union Of India

2024-08-20Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16679 of 2022 ====================================================== Shakti Singh Son of- Late Ram Pravesh Singh, resident of VillageNavanagar, P.S.- Udwantagar, District- Bhojpur at Ara. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of Bihar, New Delhi.

2.

The National Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, New Delhi through the Chairman. 3.

The Chairman, the National Authority of India, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India, New Delhi. 4.

The Project Director, the National Authority of India, Bhojpur. 5.

The State of Bihar through Principle Secretary, Revenue Department, New Secretariat, Govt. of Bihar.

6.

The Divisional Commissioner, Patna.

7.

The District Magistrate, Bhojpur.

8.

The Competent Authority -cum- District Land Acquisition Officer, Bhojpur. 9.

The Additional Collector-cum- Enquiry Officer, Bhojpur. 10.

The Circle Officer, Block- Udwant Nagar, Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nirbhay Prashant, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25 For the U.O.I :

Ms. Kanak Verma, Advocate For the NHAI :

Dr. Iti Suman, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024 Heard Mr. Nirbhay Prashant, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, learned counsel for the State, Ms. Kanak Verma, learned counsel for the Union of India and Dr. Iti Suman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the NHAI.

2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CWJC No.16679 of 2022(2) dt.20-08-2024 2/2 petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to the petitioner to move before the appropriate forum to challenge the order dated 08.02.2022 passed in N.H. Arbitration Case No. 602 of 2019 (Annexure-7) of the writ petition.

3. Permission is accorded.

4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) ajay/- U