Patna High CourtMJC/4076/2013disposed

Vikash Kumar v. Mr. Vimal Kumar And ORS.

2015-03-12Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.4076 of 2013 dt.12-03-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4076 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3970 of 2010 =========================================================== Vikash Kumar, Son of Late R.B. Thakur, resident of Mohalla- Mithanpura, P.O. Ramna, District Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. Mr. Vimal Kumar, the Vice Chancellor, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

2. Akhilesh Kumar Mishra, the Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

3. Guljar Ram, The Deputy Registrar, B.R.A. Bihar University, Muzaffarpur.

4. Arun Kumar Singh, The Controller of Examination B.R.A. Bihar Unviersity, Muzaffarpur.

5. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. DR. MAHTAB AHMAD For the Respondent/s : Mr. HARENDRA KUMAR TIWARY =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the B.R.A. Bihar University.

The present contempt application has been filed for noncompliance of the order dated 08.11.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3970 of 2010.

Learned for the officials of B.R.A. Bihar University (opposite party nos. 1 to 4) submits that in compliance of the order dated 08.11.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 3970 of 2010, the University, in the light of the decision of the Examination Board of the University held on 05.01.2015 considered the matter and has issued the marks sheet of the petitioner of B.Sc. Part-II

Patna High Court MJC No.4076 of 2013 dt.12-03-2015 Examination 2007. The original marks sheet of the petitioner has been sent to the Dr. J. Mishra College, Muzaffarpur, which would appear from paragraph 7 of the show cause.

Since the order, under contempt, has been complied with by the concerned opposite parties, therefore, no further action is required. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U