Guddu Mian @ Abdul Khan @ Laddu Miyan @ Laddu Miya v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.72621 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-376 Year-2023 Thana- MIRGANJ District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Guddu Mian @ Abdul Khan @ Laddu Miyan @ Laddu Miya S/O Late Nazir Khan @ Najir Khan R/O Village Ward No.- 10, Purab Muhalla Brahm Asthan, P.S- Mirganj, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Gaurav Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pushpa Sinha1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-12-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.
2. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 285 , 286, 427 and 34 of the I. P . C . and Section 3 , 4, 5 of the Explosive Substances Act 1908 .
3 . As per the prosecution case, on 02.10.2023 , on hearing the sound of an explosion, the patrolling party arrived at the place of occurrence, where it was informed that this petitioner, along with other co-accused persons, were involved in the illegal production of fire crackers, and during the course of manufacturing, one bomb exploded in which some of the persons sustained injuries and nearby houses were damaged.
4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.72621 of 2024(2) dt.19-12-2024 2/2 has falsely been implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. No incriminating material has been recovered from the possession or from residence of the petitioner. He is no way involved in the illegal manufacturing of the alleged fire crackers. Lastly, he submits that petitioner has been made accused in this case because he happens to be relative of coaccused Shama Begum. Petitioner is in custody since 25.07.2024 .
5 . Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposed the bail application .
6. Considering the nature of accusation and period of custody, the bail application is allowed. Let the above named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM Gopalganj in connection with Mirganj P. S. Case No. 376 of 2023 . (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T