Murli Kuamr Rai @ Murli Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.66055 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2022 Thana- SISWAN District- Siwan ====================================================== MURLI KUAMR RAI @ MURLI RAI S/o Parshuram Rai R/o VillageBharwaha, P.S.- Siswan, Distt- Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raghav Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 18-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner apprehends arrest in connection with Siwan P.S. Case No. 10 of 2022 registered for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the instant case due to land dispute. He further submitted that the petitioner is a student and has no criminal antecedent. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State opposes the prayer of bail and submits that there is direct allegation against the petitioner of giving a sabal blow on the head of the informant causing grievous injury. He therefore

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.66055 of 2022(2) dt.18-01-2023 2/2 submits that petitioner does not deserve to be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Considering the nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner and the submissions advanced on behalf of the parties, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. His prayer for bail is accordingly rejected.

anuradha/- (Arvind Srivastava, J) U T