Ragib @ Md. Ragib @ Raghib v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29633 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -835 Year- 2016 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Ragib @ Md. Ragib @ Raghib S/o Md. Ayub resident of Village- Doria Sonapur Ward No. 9, P.S. Simraha, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

Petitioner has earlier moved this Court for grant of bail, which was rejected by order dated 20.2.2017 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 7089 of 2017 (Annexure-1) with an observation that petitioner may renew his prayer for bail after framing of charge in this case.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that now charge has been framed in this case.

Heard learned APP also.

In view of observation made earlier, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge-cum-

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29633 of 2017 (2) dt.05-07-2017 2/2 Special Judge (NDPS), Araria, in connection with Special Case No. 43 of 2016, arising out of Araria (R.S.) P.S.Case No. 835 of 2016, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U