Md. Sajjak @ Sajak @ Pai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27766 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -126 Year- 2017 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Md. Sajjak @ Sajak @ Pai Son of Md. Majhar Resident of VillageChakorwa, Ward No. 15 Sonapur, P.S. Narpatganj, District Araria. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

This is an application for bail in connection with Narpatganj P.S.Case No. 126 of 2017 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Case is under Section 498A IPC and petitioner is husband.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that parties have settled the dispute outside court and a compromise petition has been filed in court by the informant, copy of which has been filed by way of a supplementary affidavit, and petitioner is in custody since 24.3.2017.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, learned court below is directed to verify the matter and if it is so, let the petitioner, named above, be

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27766 of 2017 (3) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Narpatganj P.S.Case No. 126 of 2017, otherwise learned court is free to pass any other order(s) as he may deem fit and proper, subject to the conditions that :- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable properties within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

With the above observation, this application is disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U