Vikas Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65768 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-846 Year-2025 Thana- Excise P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Vikas Kumar Son of Karu Yadav Resident of Village - Damka, P.S. - Fatehpur, Dist. - Gayaji, Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the State :
Mr.Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaya Excise P.S. Case No. 846 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) and 32(3)of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, there is recovery of 160 litres of illicit country made liquor from a car
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he is in custody since 07.08.2025 and claims clean antecedent.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner.
6. The name of the petitioner has come in the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65768 of 2025(2) dt.24-09-2025 2/2 confessional statement of the co-accused.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Exclusive Special Excise Court No. 3, Gaya/concerned Court below in connection with Gaya Excise P.S. Case No. 846 of 2025.
8. At the time of accepting bail bonds of the petitioner, the Court below will verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner. If it is found that the petitioner has criminal antecedent, the Court below shall not accept the bail bonds of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner has clean antecedent, his bail bonds shall be accepted by the Court below. (Sandeep Kumar, J) P. Kumar U T