Virendra Ray @ Birendra Ray v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67887 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2025 Thana- DEWARIA District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Virendra ray @ Birendra Ray Son of Laxman ray Resident of Village - Madhopur Bujurg, P.S. .- Deoria, Dist. - Muzaffarpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 07-10-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Deoria P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025, instituted for the offences under Sections 191(3), 191(2), 126(2), 115, 109, 132, 352, 351(2), 274, 275 of the B.N.S. and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, on secret information that co-accused Anil Rai and Sunil Rai were preparing country made liquor in their house, police party conducted raid. During raid, accused persons including the petitioner along with 15 unknown accused persons attacked on the police party. It is alleged that 20 litre country made liquor was recovered from the house of co-accused Santosh Nut and 20 litre illicit liquor was recovered from the house of co-accused Anil Rai and Sunil Rai.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67887 of 2025(2) dt.07-10-2025 2/2

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of suspicion. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner. It is alleged that the petitioner was a member of the mob. Petitioner has no concern with the seized liquor or with the co-accused persons. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He undertakes to co-operate in the investigation and trial.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, in the event of arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks from today, the Petitioner, above-named, be released on bail upon furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-II, Muzaffarpur in connection with Deoria P.S. Case No. 106 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down in Section 482 (2) of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (B.N.S.S.), 2023.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J.) rakhi U T