Jeetendar Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70610 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-149 Year-2018 Thana- SANGRAMPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Jeetendar Mukhiya Son of Indal Mukhiya Resident of Village - Koirgawa Been Toli, P.S. - Sangrampur, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.

Mr. Hemant Ray, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2024 Heard Mr. Abhishek Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 323, 324, 354, 379, 307, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Allegedly, all the FIR named accused persons including the petitioner are said to have abused and assaulted the informant's side brutally by means of deadly weapons due to which they sustained injuries. They also took away Rs. 15,000/- from the pocket of the informant and his brother.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70610 of 2024(2) dt.20-12-2024 2/3

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. No such occurrence as alleged has ever taken place. He has falsely been implicated in this case due to ulterior motive. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is totally false and based on concocted facts. There is previous enmity between the parties. Nothing specific has been attributed against the petitioner. The nature of the injuries sustained by the injured is not mentioned in the impugned order. Similarly situated co-accused have been enlarged on bail by this court vide order dated 25.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66450 of 2022. Learned counsel further submits that petitioner has seven criminal antecedents as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

5. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

6. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since similarly situated co-accused have been granted bail by this Court, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70610 of 2024(2) dt.20-12-2024 3/3 Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Sangrampur P.S. Case No. 149 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T