Karu Sah @ Karu Saw @ Pradip Saw v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69912 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-279 Year-2024 Thana- WARISLIGANJ District- Nawada ====================================================== Karu Sah @ Karu Saw @ Pradip Saw Son of Gorelal Sah Resident of Village - Sarai (Thera Sarai), P.S.- Warisaliganj, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Manmohan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Rita Verma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a)(d) of the Bihar Excise Act.

3.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that inadvertently at para-3 of the anticipatory bail application, it has been pleaded that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent when he has antecedent of one case. It is next submitted that allegation is of recovery of 35 litres of liquor from two different place as detailed in the FIR.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was not arrested from the spot as such nothing was recovered from his conscious possession and he came to be

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69912 of 2024(2) dt.26-09-2024 2/2 implicated at the instance of Chowkidar with whom he is on an inimical term.

5.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

6.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Warisaliganj P.S. Case No. 279 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. 7.

It is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedents of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that the petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to. (Satyavrat Verma, J) SUMIT/- U T