Vimal Prakash @ Chunnu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67155 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-100 Year-2023 Thana- HASPURA District- Aurangabad ====================================================== Vimal Prakash @ Chunnu Son of Rajendra Prasad Singh, Resident of Village - Barailichak, P.S. - Haspura, District- Aurangabad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Priyanka Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-12-2023 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within a period of four weeks from today.

3. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Haspura P.S. Case No. 100 of 2023 registered for the offence under Sections 304B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

4. As per the prosecution case, the deceased was killed by the accused persons for demand of dowry of Rs. 5 lakhs.

5. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no material to support the allegation and the deceased has committed suicide.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67155 of 2023(3) dt.13-12-2023 2/2

6. Learned APP for State and learned counsel for the informant has opposed the application of the petitioner for grant of bail by contending that the dead body of the deceased was cremated without any information to the prosecution side and materials have come during investigation to show that the deceased was killed by the accused persons.

7. In view of the facts and circumstances, as mentioned above, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

8. Accordingly, the prayer of bail of the petitioner is rejected herewith.

9. The Court below is directed to expedite the trial.

10. If there is delay in the trial then the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

(Sandeep Kumar, J) Vikas/- U T