Rahul Singh @ Bihari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65297 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-255 Year-2025 Thana- GRIYAK District- Nalanda ====================================================== Rahul Singh @ Bihari S/o Satish Singh R/o Village - Katardih, P.S - Katarisarai, District - Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anirudh Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Choubey Jawahar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 17-09-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail apprehending his arrest in connection with Griyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case no. 255 of 2025, registered under sections 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 61(2), 338, 340(2), 126(2), 115(2) and 132 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and sections 66(C) and 66 (D) of the I.T. Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant states that having received information about the accused persons involved in cyber crime etc having gathered, a raid was conducted. It is stated that while other accused managed to escape, seven accused persons were arrested and various incriminating articles including mobile phones, ATM cards etc were recovered from their possession. It is further stated that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65297 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 2/3 accused who were caught, on enquiry disclosed the names of four persons who had managed to escape and which included the petitioner herein.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from the contents of the FIR itself it would transpire that neither the petitioner was arrested at the spot nor any incriminating article recovered from his possession. The only material against the petitioner is the statement of co-accused made before police. The cause of false implication of the petitioner are his antecedents. The petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation/trial.

5. The application for anticipatory bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner in the F.I.R., his not having been arrested at the spot, no incriminating article having been recovered from the petitioner's possession and the only material against the petitioner being the statement of co-accused made before police, it is directed that the petitioner above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks, be released on anticipatory bail in connection with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65297 of 2025(2) dt.17-09-2025 3/3 Griyak (Katrisarai) P.S. Case no. 255 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda (Biharsharif).

(Partha Sarthy, J) Shiv/- U T