← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61051/2019bail granted

Ranjeet Kumar @ Ranjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2019-11-07Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61051 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2017 Thana- SAKSOHRA District- Patna ====================================================== RANJEET KUMAR @ RANJIT KUMAR Son of Krishna Nandan Prasad @ Krishn Nandan Prasad R/O Mohalla- Badi Chaudharain Chak, P.S. Belchhi, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Chandra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 07-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code..

The prosecution case in short is that the accused persons took the amount from the informant for registering a piece of land but later did not execute sale deed and duped with the amount.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 4.6.2019. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. Chargesheet has been submitted in the present case. The petitioner has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61051 of 2019(2) dt.07-11-2019 2/2 falsely been implicated in the present case. The present matter relates to sale and purchase of land. It is claimed that the informant had deposited money for purchasing the land but the sale deed in respect to the land has not been executed by the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner is ready to deposit a sum of Rs. one lakh in the court below which will be subject to the final disposal of the case.

On behalf of the State and informant, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. A wrongful loss has been caused to the informant.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, on deposit of a sum of Rs. one lakh in the Court below which will be subject to final disposal of the cas e , it is directed that the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. Barh, Patna in connection with Saksohra P.S. Case No. 15/17.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T