← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4378/2012disposed

Suresh Rao v. The Union Of India And ORS

2020-08-19The Chief Justice -,Mr. Justice S. Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4378 of 2012 ====================================================== Suresh Rao, son of Gyan Rao, Resident Of Village - Sargatia (Narkatiaganj), Police Station - Sikta, District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Principal Secretary, Ministry of Defense, New Delhi.

2.

The General Officer Commanding-In-Chief , Southern Command, Pune 3.

The Adjutant General, Provost Marshals Office Branch, Army Headquarter Dho, P.O. - New Delhi-11 4.

The General Officer Commanding Goc, Maharashtra And Gujarat Area Provost Unit, Colaba, Mumbai 5.

The Commanding Officer, Maharashtra And Gujarat Area Provost Unit, Colaba Mumbai 6.

The Senior Accounts Officer, Office Of Combined Defence Accounts (CDA), Bangalore-07 7.

The Pension Accounts Officer Pao, Other Ranks (OR), Cops Of Military Police, Bangalore 8.

The Chief Record Officer (GRO), Corps Of Military Police Records, Bangalore.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Zainul Abedin, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Anshuman Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) 19-08-2020 Matter stands wrongly listed, for in terms of order dated 23.08.2017 passed in CWJC No.506 of 2006 titled as Narendra Kumar Versus the Union of India & Ors. and other connected matters, including the present one, which is reproduced as under:

Patna High Court CWJC No.4378 of 2012(9) dt.19-08-2020 2/2 "These matters have been filed before this Court by persons serving in various forces, defined as the Armed Forces. By virtue of the provisions of Section 34 of the Arms Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, these petitions are now required to be transferred to the respective Armed Forces Tribunal created under the Act, 2007, as the jurisdiction to deal with the service matter as defined under Section 3 (o) of the Act, 2007 w.e.f. the appointed day i.e. 15.06.2008 vests in the Tribunal.

Accordingly, office is directed to take steps for transfer of the matters to the respective Armed Forces Tribunal."

The matter already stands transferred to the respective Armed Forces Tribunal. As such, no further orders are required to be passed in this case.

(Sanjay Karol, CJ) ( S. Kumar, J) pallavi/- U